" />

Association for Free Research and International Cooperation

Log in Join the community

Eat to live or live to eat?

This question first highlights the reality of life. "Living to eat" highlights the situation of the poor or middle-class people who work all their lives only to eat, therefore no savings, no holidays, good food ... and in case of problems or urgency it is the disaster, the misery ... "Eat to live" being quite the opposite, concerns the rich who do not make calculations because everything is ready and within reach.


Then, she puts forward a necessity: “eat to live”, something obvious, otherwise we will die. However, there is a limit to this need: “you must not live to eat”, which is bad for your health.

Finally, it emerges from this question that one must use one’s resources to do important and useful things eat to live, instead of wasting them by doing unnecessary things live to eat.

In conclusion and in view of all that has been said above, I would say that we must eat to live and not live to eat.

To view full news and leave comments you must be logged in. Please join the community