Association for Free Research and International Cooperation

Nigeria: back on the presidential debate

It was a debate many attendees found interesting despite the absence of the two main contenders.The debate was originally to bring together the top five candidates, including the outgoing head of state, to confront their ideas and programs.

However, those interviewed  could hardly distinguish the performance of the three candidates who eventually participated. The debate was as apolitical as it was passion driven.

The candidates rather than take shots on each other tailored their points on questions thrown at them.

ela Durotoye, Atiku Abubakar, Oby Ezekwesili, Muhammadu Buhari and Kingsley Moghalu were the five aspirants invited to take part in the debate organised by the Nigerian Election Debate Group (NEDG) and the Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria (BON).

But President Buhari of the ruling APC and his main opposition challenger of the PDP, Mr Abubakar did not attend.

In their absence however, the presidential candidates of the Allied Congress Party of Nigeria (ACPN) Mrs Ezekwesili; The Alliance for New Nigerian Party (ANNP), Mr Durotoye; and the Young Progressives Party (YPP) Mr Moghalu, took to the stage to sell themselves to Nigerians.

Respondents rated their performance high but were quite reluctant to identify who did a better job among the candidates.

Moderator anchored questions thrown to the candidates mainly on the fight against poverty and corruption, security, education, health and how they will fund their respective governments.

Perhaps, statistical blunders recorded during the vice presidential debate five weeks ago informed the decision of the candidates to appear quite cautious in reeling out facts and figures this time around.

They rather focused on their plans, programmes and how these will be funded. In the end, they succeeded in blowing away the minds of the spectators.

Most of the observers of the debate who described themselves as non-partisan rated the three candidates high and said it was a close call.

Others gave it to the candidates they apparently supported.

A spectator who simply identified himself as Collins said it was almost impossible to grade the candidates.

“I believe three of them stood out at each category depending on the field they answered. When you look at it critically, you will see they did not debate. From their responses, you will see each of them has his own line of argument in a particular question since there was no common denominator of the answer.

“So ultimately you cannot grade them. This shows Nigerians are getting it better by this type of debate. It must be encouraged because left to those who are in this hall, I am telling you our president would have emerged from these three,” he said.

“For me, the candidates performed very well in terms of their apt response to the questions and comportment,”Peter Morgan, an Abuja-based lawyer said. “My challenge is that whether good people like these will be allowed by the system to lead the country.

Read the original article here

To view full news and leave comments you must be logged in. Please join the community